Games with Synergistic Preferences

نویسنده

  • Julian Jamison
چکیده

In economic situations a player often has preferences regarding not only his or her own outcome but also regarding what happens to fellow players, concerns that are entirely apart from any strategic considerations. While this can be modeled directly by simply writing down a player’s final preferences, these are commonly unknown a priori. In many cases it is therefore both helpful and instructive to explicitly model these interactions. This paper, building on a model due to Bergstrom (1989, 1999), presents a simple structure in the context of game theory that incorporates the “synergies” between players. It is powerful enough to cover a wide range of such interactions and model many disparate experimental and empirical results, yet it is straightforward enough to be used in many applied situations where altruism, or a baser motive, is implied.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A review on symmetric games: theory, comparison and applications

Game theory models decision makers' behaviors in strategic situations. Since the structures of games are different, behavior and preferences of the players are different in various types of game. This paper reviews various situations of games. Here, characteristics of some common games are discussed and compared. Specifically, we focus on a group of games called symmetric games including Prison...

متن کامل

Compact Preference Representation for Boolean Games

Boolean games, introduced by [15, 14], allow for expressing compactly two-players zero-sum static games with binary preferences: an agent’s strategy consists of a truth assignment of the propositional variables she controls, and a player’s preferences is expressed by a plain propositional formula. These restrictions (two-players, zero-sum, binary preferences) strongly limit the expressivity of ...

متن کامل

Evolutionarily stable conjectures and other regarding preferences in duopoly games

We study the evolutionary selection of conjectures in duopoly games when players have other regarding preferences, i.e. preferences over payoff distributions. In both the Cournot and Bertrand duopoly games, the consistent conjectures are independent of other regarding preferences. Both duopoly games have evolutionarily stable conjectures that depend on other regarding preferences but that do no...

متن کامل

ar X iv : 1 10 5 . 18 24 v 2 [ cs . G T ] 3 D ec 2 01 1 Individual - based stability in hedonic games depending on the best or worst players ∗

We consider hedonic coalition formation games in which each player has preferences over the other players and his preferences over coalition structures are based on the best player (B-/B-hedonic games) or the worst player (W /W-hedonic games) in his coalition. We show that for B-hedonic games, an individually stable partition is guaranteed to exist and can be computed efficiently. Similarly, th...

متن کامل

Rousseau ’ s Whale Hunt ? Coordination among Big - Game

In spite of its common use as a tool for examining cooperation, the prisoner’s dilemma game does not conform to the reality of many socio-ecological contexts. Situations in which people engage in joint activities and maintain agreement in their preferences for outcomes are called “coordination games” by game theorists and “mutualism” by biologists. Coordination games are common, but cooperative...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Games

دوره 3  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2012